B.C. Hydro's projects on the Columbia
River and its tributaries consist of six major facilities completed
after 1967 and five smaller developments completed prior to 1961.
Terms of Water Licences for the
major projects included requirements for recreation (with the exception
of the Kootenay Canal project which has no reservoir). As well,
increased public awareness and concern for environmental responsibility
during the past two decades have brought the impact of these hydroelectric
projects under closer public scrutiny. Public concern about poor
reservoir access at Kinbasket Lake and Duncan Reservoir, along with
public perceptions about outstanding recreation commitments at Arrow,
Koocanusa, Pend d-Oreille, Whatshand and Revelstoke Reservoirs have
brought such matters to the attention of a number of provincial
agencies and community groups.
Because it was felt that these numerous
interests had the potential to produce an array of separate, disjointed
initiatives, B.C. Hydro felt it was timely and prudent to consider
a mechanism that would establish a management structure to address
reservoir recreation issues with foresight, and in a coherent manner.
It suggested that this structure consist of a Steering Committee
and a Technical Committee, who would ensure consistency for management
and planning of basin initiatives. Local reservoir committees would
develop specific reservoir plans and programs. Responsibility for
program delivery would be allocated as appropriate through deliberations
of the Basin Technical and Steering Committee.
The establishment of a single recreation
management fund is also proposed, with the interest deriving to
finance annual budgets to support mitigation programs. It was felt
that the advantage of this approach would allow funding activities
to be more:
Responsive
- to changing needs and priorities of resources
and resource users.
Adequate
- of sufficient size to undertake larger,
more effective programs than would otherwise be possible.
Stable
- and not subject to the uncertainties of annual operating or capital
budget allocations or cuts.
Balanced -
between regional interests, between reservoir areas, and among recreational
users.
The concept put forward in this
report proposes that for management purposes, all reservoirs, dams,
diversions and generation facilities within the Columbia River Basin
be considered a single development. Major recreation impacts of
the "development" would then be identified and appropriate
mitigation determined, and priority assigned.
In addition to developing and managing
recreation programs within the scope of a Basin Fund, the organization
and structure proposed is hoped to serve as a vehicle for truly
integrated planning among all agencies in the Region.