Search



 
Home
Columbia Basin Map
About the Author
Related WebSites
Abstracts
Catalogue
Table of Content

 

 

 

Socio-Economic Montage

Exploring Commercial Thinning Opportunities
Arrow and Cranbrook TSA

Authored by: Ivan Listar, R.P.F.

Prepared for: Ministry of Forests 

March 1999

Location of Publication:
"Columbia Basin Trust Collection"
Ministry of Forests, Nelson, BC

The last Timber Supply Review (TSR) reduced the Annual Allowable Cut (AAC) in the Nelson Forest Region from 6.0 million m3 per year to 5.5 m3 per year. The implementation of the Kootenay Boundary Land Use Plan (KBLUP) is expected to reduce the AAC to between 4.7 and 5.2 million m3/year. This represents a 13.3 percent to 21.7 percent drop in AAC. The implementation of the KBLUP may translate into a projected loss of 450-560 direct jobs and $10.5 million of direct stumpage per year.

A greater reliance on partial cutting systems, compared to clearcutting, may minimize the wood supply fall downs while addressing the management requirements of other resources. The Chief Forester has indicated that before commercial thinning impacts could be considered in future TSRs, candidate commercial thinning stands must be identified, a commercial thinning strategy must be developed and the impacts of a commercial thinning program on the timber supply must be assessed.

The main objectives of this project were to:

complete an overview analysis of suitable forest types and candidate stands for commercial thinning in the Arrow and Cranbrook Timber Supply Areas (TSA);

complete a field inventory of a portion of the themed stands to determine the suitability for commercial thinning; and,

test the impact of different levels of commercial thinning on wood flow in the study areas.

Additional objectives for the Cranbrook TSA included:

quantify/describe the population stands suitable for commercial thinning;

identify and locate sufficient stands for two years of operational commercial thinning;

demonstrate to Forest Renewal BC the potential of commercial thinning in order to secure funding for future related projects; and,

use the information obtained in this project to promote and support a potential commercial thinning program in the next TSR.

This project addresses some of the Chief Forester's recommendations in the context of the recently-approved Kootenay-Boundary Land Use Plan by providing a framework for developing a commercial thinning strategy using Arrow and Cranbrook as pilot TSAs. The framework can be modified to suit the specific conditions and objectives of other TSAs as required. It consists of identifying utilization and economic criteria, theme mapping to identify potential areas, field inventories of potential areas to identify actual candidate stands and wood supply modelling to test the effects of various levels of commercial wood flow.

Theming initially identified approximately 44,557 hectares of potential stands in the Arrow TSA and 24,843 hectares in Cranbrook TSA. Lack of road access subsequently eliminated approximately 85 to 90% of the themed stands as potential candidates for thinning. Reconnaissance surveys in the accessible stands indicated that approximately 80-90% of the stands surveyed were unsuitable for thinning, mainly due to inappropriate stand structure or low potential thinning volumes. Only a subset of surveyed stands was cruised in each TSA. The cruising identified between 10,298 and 14,195 m3 of potential thinning volume in Arrow TSA and 32,650 to 41,704 m3 in Cranbrook TSA, depending on the minimum utilization level. However, District staff anticipate that only 40-60% of the cruised stands may actually be thinned due to stand structure and overriding management objectives.

Resource Emphasis Area (REA) management objectives, current stand structure, biological potential of the stand to maintain adequate growth after thinning and utilization level by species must all be considered when developing thinning prescriptions. There are trade-offs between potential thinning volume, stand growth and forest health depending on the emphasis of any of these factors.

In the Arrow TSA, at 2 to 5% increase in short term wood supply was indicated by the modelling when the thinning was concentrated in visually constrained Resource Emphasis Areas. The positive effects on wood flow were maximized at 400 hectares per year but were only suitable for the first six decades. The increase in wood flow attributed to commercial thinning is not additive to the increase from other partial cutting practices in constrained areas. Some of the benefits may already be realized due to the amount of partial cutting currently being practiced.

At the forest level, there appears to be an optimum balance between clearcutting and partial cutting systems that maximizes wood flow, but it varies by landscape unit, silviculture and management constraints. Both the timing and location of the partial cutting is critical, and if it is not targeted in the most constraining landscape units and REAs, the positive impacts on wood flow will not be achieved.

Link to Definitions:


1. Commercial Thinning

Commercial thinning is a form of partial cutting that is defined as the removal of a portion of the trees in which all, or a portion, of the felled trees are extracted for useful products, regardless if their value is great enough to defray the cost of the operation. Commercial thinning is typically done in stands that are not mature or that are younger than the minimum harvest age.

At the stand level, commercial thinning can:

redistribute the growth potential on selected crops trees;

utilize all the merchantable material produced from a stand including salvaged mortality;

increase the value of the final crop, though increased log sizes, while lowering the harvest and milling costs;

improve stand vigour and lower the risk of future pest losses and sometimes increase yield.

If not planned correctly, commercial thinning will reduce cumulative volume. At the forest level, commercial thinning can:

deliver wood earlier than harvesting at culmination ages;

alleviate wood supply shortages by addressing age class imbalances, and lengthening technical rotations;

achieve integrated resource management (IRM) objectives such as visual quality and greenup; and,

dampen fluctuations in timber supply while keeping mills open, employing people and stabilizing communities through earlier wood supply.

2. Resource Emphasis Area

Resource Emphasis Areas (REAs), developed by the Ministry of Forests and the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks for the KBLUP, allow different maximum levels of basal area removals to meet their specific management objectives. The REAs are hierachical and the guidelines apply to mature stands. REAs, in order of hierarchical priority are: caribou habitat, VQO Retention, VQO partial retention, community watershed, domestic watershed, ungulate winter range and integrated resource management.

 
 

Home ] Up ] Columbia Basin Map ] About the Author ] Related WebSites ] Catalogue ] Table of Content ]

   
Living Landscapes
Royal BC Museum

Copyright © Royal BC Museum
All rights reserved

 

 

 

Terms of Use Warranty Disclaimer Copyright Privacy Statement