Physical Structure of Aquatic
Ecosystems
Introduction
Long, narrow deep,
fjord-like lakes nestled between high, jagged mountain ranges characterize
the landscape of the Columbia Basin. In the Jurassic period, the
North American plate moved northwest over the ancestral Pacific
basin. As it moved, the leading edge picked up terranes, which folded
, thickened and thrust-faulted against the existing continent, forming
the dramatic peaks and trenches of the Rocky, Purcell, Selkirk and
Monashee Mountain ranges (see Earliest
Beginnings). Aquatic ecosystems prior to the most recent Ice
Age, 15,000 years ago, are virtually unknown, although fossil remains
suggest a flourishing and diverse population of water-based organisms.
In BC, no fish survived the Ice Ages. After the ice which covered
all of BC retreated 13,000 years ago, fish immigrated from Puget
Sound in the west, the southern Columbia River in the south, the
Great Plains to the east and from the Yukon refuge to the north.
Given the geographic barriers (mountains) to the north, west and
east, it is likely that fish from the south populated the Columbia
Basin.
Changes to the physical
structure of an ecosystem affect the way the plants and animals
within the system interact with their physical environment and with
each other. In the Columbia River basin, the geological changes
which created the long, deep, narrow, steep-sided, fjord-type basins
of the Arrow and Kootenay Lakes were dramatic but came gradually,
giving ecosystem members time to adapt to their new physical environment.
Resident species occupied unique niches and continued to respond
to the subtle pressures of competition, predation and minor geographical
changes (flooding and landslides for example). Glaciers continue
to carve alpine lakes by their movement and melt patterns. Throughout
the mountains of the Columbia Basin there are small lakes left by
the patterns of glaciation. These small lakes can have unique populations
of fish when they have an isolated ecosystem. Many of the lakes
are now stocked with trout to support a flourishing tourism fishery.
More information on small lakes in the Columbia Basin can be found
at: http://www.bcadventure.com
McPhail and Carveth
(1992) describe the physical structure of the main drainages in
the Columbia Basin thus:
"In their
ecology and climate, the upper Columbia and upper Kootenay Rivers
are similar. Both rise at high altitude and receive tributaries
directly from glaciers in the Rocky and Purcell mountains. Even
in summer they are cold, turbulent and silt-loaded environments
that resemble the melt-water channels and streams of early postglacial
times more than the clear, less turbulent lower reaches of the
same rivers. The native fish fauna in the upper reaches of these
rivers is limited to a few species that are able to tolerate the
harsh environment. Because of the mountainous terrain, there are
barriers (falls and rapids) on most upper Columbia tributaries.
Usually, only trout or char occur above these barriers, although
occasionally there are sculpins. Although both rainbow and cutthroat
trout can occur above falls, they rarely co-exist in such situations.
In the lower
Columbia and lower Kootenay, the gradient lessens, the silt load
settles out and the rivers become clear and, although still strongly
flowing, they are less turbulent. As well, both rivers in their
lower reaches flow through large, oligotrophic lakes: the Columbia
through Arrow Lakes and the Kootenay through Kootenay Lake."
There are numerous mineral hot springs
throughout the Columbia Basin. Hot (up to 90 degrees C) alkaline
water seeps or flows from the earth after it has been heated by
volcanic forces. The hot springs host a variety of blue-green algae
or cyanobacteria. Their ability to grow and reproduce in the hot,
alkaline, highly mineralized conditions has given rise to the theory
that life arose 3.5 billion years ago in similar hot, mineral seas
which then covered the earth. Visitors from all over the world are
attracted to the developed hot springs resorts such as Nakusp, Halcyon,
Fairmont, Radium and Ainsworth Hot Springs, while a map, some off-road
driving and a solid pair of hiking boots attracts others to many
undeveloped hot springs tucked in amongst the trees in the hills.
More information can be found at: http://www.ohwy.com
Human-Induced Changes
Dams and Reservoirs
During the twentieth
century, humanity has wrought major physical change on the aquatic
ecosystems of the Columbia Basin. The changes we've made have been
likened to "an Ice Age in fast forward mode", accelerating
the pressure on species hundreds of times, far faster that they
can adapt to (MOELP website, 1999). Five dams impede the natural
flow of water in the Columbia Basin, their reservoirs flooding a
total area of 654.7 square kilometres and holding 15.5 million acre
feet more of stream storage than the pre-dam lakes and rivers. It
is only now, after over 30 years of altered ecosystems, that the
impacts of the dams are being realized.
Columbia River
The Columbia River
headwaters are at Columbia Lake, nestled in between the Rocky and
Purcell Mountains. As the Columbia River flows north, it collects
water from the mountains and flows into Kinbasket Lake. Prior to
its damming, the river flowed through the Rockies and then the Columbia
Mountains, made a dramatic turn southward at Mica and continued
on into Upper Arrow Lake, near Arrowhead (30-40 kilometres south
of Revelstoke). The Selkirk (Lardeau and Valhalla Ranges), Purcell
(Bugaboo Range) and Monashee (Gold Range) Mountains drain into Arrow
Lakes. Arrow Lakes was two lakes, Upper and Lower Arrow, connected
by a short riverine section. The Columbia River left Lower Arrow
Lakes north of Castlegar, to be joined by Kootenay and Pend d'Oreille
Rivers and continue on through Washington and Oregon states.
The Grand
Coulee dam was build in 1941 on the Columbia River in Washington
state, and later joined by 11 other American dams on the Columbia
before it empties into the Pacific Ocean at Astoria, Oregon. Construction
of these dams eliminated the migratory salmon and sturgeon from
the upper Columbia River valley. As a result of the Columbia
River Treaty signed between Canada and
the USA in 1964, three hydroelectric dams have been constructed
(Keenleyside, Mica and Duncan), their reservoirs now covering a
total area of 2023 square kilometres and draining almost 40,000
square kilometres of watersheds. The dams were constructed to store
water for hydroelectric power generation in the USA and to help
control the periodic and sometimes devastating floods throughout
the Columbia River valley. In return for building three dams, BC
became entitled to half the additional power generated in the USA
that resulted from storage operations in Canada. In 1994, 30 years
after the Columbia River Treaty was finalized, a Memorandum of Agreement
was signed between BC and the USA which now sees revenue from the
downstream benefits flowing back to the valleys the water flowed
from.
The Hugh Keenleyside
Dam, one of the Treaty dams, was constructed in 1969 at the outflow
to lower Arrow Lakes, 8 km north of Castlegar. In order to flood
the valley, BC Hydro extirpated people from their lands, often in
spite of generations of settlement. The fertile valley bottom was
flooded, covering 56.9 square kilometres of streams, marsh, forest
and cultivated farm habitat. In the process, 30% of kokanee spawning
and rearing habitat in the Arrow Lakes basin
was eliminated. The dam increased the size of the existing lakes
to a 465 square kilometres reservoir with a volume of 38.6 cubic
kilometres and an active storage capacity of 7000 million cubic
metres. Arrow Lakes is now a two basin lake with a 287 metre maximum
depth in the upper basin, a shallow narrows section and a lower
basin with a 194 metre maximum depth.
To satisfy the Columbia
River Treaty, Mica Dam was constructed on the upper Columbia River
in 1973, forming Kinbasket Lake reservoir. The reservoir is 310
square kilometres, and stretches for 216 km. It can actively store
14,800 million cubic metres of water, assisted by a maximum drawdown
of 47 m. Mica is the only Treaty dam with a generating station;
it can generate 1736 MW of power. Although no estimate of fish losses
was made prior to construction, it was later discovered that some
of the trophy rainbow from the Arrow Lakes spawned upstream of the
Mica Dam.
Downstream from
Mica, Revelstoke Dam and Generating Station were constructed in
1984 to capture the benefits from the water storage in the Mica
Reservoir. The dam was not part of the Columbia River Treaty and
provides no storage of water. This run-of-the-river dam generates
1843MW of power at Revelstoke. Filling the reservoir created behind
the Revelstoke Dam caused the river level to rise; 26.4 square kilometres
of land was flooded, including 200 km of tributaries which fed the
Columbia River and 150 km of river's mainstream used by spawning
Arrow Lakes kokanee, bull trout and rainbow. Some compensation for
lost fish and fish habitat has been realized through Hill Creek
Hatchery and Spawning Channel (see Research and Management of Aquatic
Ecosystems), constructed in 1979.
Kootenay River
The Kootenay River
originates in the Rocky Mountains near the source of the Columbia
River. While the Columbia flows north around the Big Bend to Mica
Dam, the Kootenay River flows south. An option under the terms of
the Columbia River Treaty, the Americans built the Libby Dam on
the Kootenay River in the USA in 1973, creating the Koocanusa Lake
reservoir which spans the Canada-USA border. Koocanusa Lake is 166
km long, covers 186 square kilometres and has a water level which
fluctuates 52 metres annually. The huge range in water levels is
due, in part, to the need to ensure adequate flow for white sturgeon
spawning below the Libby Dam. Kootenay River turns north after the
Libby Dam and reenters Canada to flow into Kootenay Lake, contributing
80% of the lake’s inflow.
The Duncan River
also feeds Kootenay Lake, comprising 10% of the inflow. Duncan Dam
was built on the Duncan River in 1967 to fulfill the obligations
of the Columbia River Treaty. The 77.7 square kilometre Duncan Lake
reservoir created behind the dam holds runoff from 2396 square kilometres
of the Purcell Mountains watersheds. The Lardeau River drains the
watersheds around Trout Lake in the Lardeau Range of the Selkirk
Mountains and then joins the Duncan River.
The
other 10% of the inflow into Kootenay Lake comes from tributaries.
A total of 56% of the flow into Kootenay Lake is regulated
by dams. When the lake was impounded , the water level increased
2.4 m, and now the annual drawdown is 3 m. Kootenay Lake stretches
107 km from the tip of its North Arm, near Lardeau, to the
tip of its South Arm, near Creston and has a 45 km long West
Arm jutting from Balfour to Nelson. The total lake covers
390 square kilometres, holds 36.7 cubic kilometres of water
and has 24.6 cubic kilometres of water flow out of it each
year. On average, its depth is 94 m and its width is 3.8 km.
The outflow from the West Arm, near Nelson, is regulated by
the 4 power stations of the Kootenay Canal, including the
Corra Linn Dam, built in 1931 (for more information on Columbia
Basin dams, see their website at http:eww.bchydro.bc.ca/info/generation/generation891.html).
South of Castlegar,
the Columbia River is joined by the Kootenay River and then the
Pend d’Orielle River. It crosses the Canada-USA border continuing
on to the Grand Coulee Dam in Washington and, after passing 11 other
American dams, finally meets the Pacific Ocean at Astoria, Oregon.
All of the
changes in the structure of the major rivers in the Columbia
Basin have had profound effects on the aquatic ecosystems
(see Biodiversity of Aquatic
Ecosystems). These ecological challenges
are currently occupying a major portion of the time and resources
of management
agencies.
Limnology and Nutrients
A lake's productivity
is based on the nutrient molecules contained in its limnetic layer,
the layer the sun penetrates into to drive photosynthesis. Nutrients
enter the system through erosion of nutrient-bearing rocks and through
the decay of organic matter. The portion of nutrients deriving from
organic matter comes from two sources: terrestrial and oceanic.
Terrestrially-derived nutrients are from the decay of plants that
grow around and in the basins and from the animals that eat these
plants, or that eat other animals that ate the plants. Oceanic nutrients
are from the decay of anadromous (migratory) fish, salmon for example,
that consumed phytoplankton in the ocean and returned to the basin
to spawn.
The nutrients in
a river and lake or reservoir system are affected by dams in two
ways that were not fully appreciated before the Columbia Basin dams
were built. First, it is now known that a large proportion of the
phosphorous in river systems that support large anadromous salmon
runs comes from the decaying carcasses of the salmon. In the Canadian
portion of Columbia Basin, anadromous salmon runs have been eliminated
since construction of the Grand Coulee dam in 1941, depriving the
Basin's aquatic ecosystem of this source of nutrients. Second, nutrients
in a system tend to be associated with particles, such as clay particles
and organic molecules, and these are heavier than water. Consequently,
in the still waters behind a dam they tend to sink and become incorporated
into the sediments at the bottom, unavailable to nourish the ecosystem.
Lakes, as still bodies of water, are often oligotrophic naturally,
but the number and size of reservoirs in the Columbia Basin increases
the area from which nutrients are sequestered into the sediments,
and hence unavailable to support the growth of phytoplankton. A
compounding feature is the operation of the reservoirs for hydroelectric
development and flood control, imposing an unnatural flow regime
(no large spring runoff that otherwise would "flush" some
sediments out of the reservoirs). This changes the timing and decreases
the residence time of what little nutrient supply there is in the
reservoirs, further limiting phytoplankton growth.
Kootenay Lake
Research began on
the Kootenay Lake nutrient regime in 1992 in an attempt to understand
the dynamics of the aquatic ecosystem. Physical limnological parameters
measured include temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, oxidation-reduction
potential (ORP), specific conductance and salinity. These parameters
were used to determine the lake’s suitability for fertilization.
The North Arm of the lake is colder, with thermal stratification
(layers of the lake separated by temperature) beginning in mid July,
whereas in the South Arm thermal stratification begins in April
and reaches a greater depth. Peak surface temperatures exceed 20
degrees C in the summer while temperatures at 50 metres remained
near 4 - 5 degrees C. Deep mixing occurs in October and November.
Dissolved oxygen, pH, ORP, specific conductance and salinity continue
to be monitored for change as the fertilization experiment proceeds.
Phosphorus (P) and
nitrogen (N) are the most common limiting factors in aquatic ecosystems.
Phosphorus load, measured as grams P per square metre per year,
was low historically, peaking when the Kimberley fertilizer plant
was active and then achieving record lows after the Duncan and Libby
Dams were constructed. As of 1998, phosphorus load has risen to
13% above historic pre-impoundment levels owing primarily to the
fertilization program.
Arrow Lakes
Nutrient loads were
examined from April to October of 1997/98 as a first step in understanding
lake productivity. Low orthophophate and a high N:P ratio were found,
indicating phosphorus-limited oligotrophic conditions. When there
is not enough P in an aquatic ecosystem, the phytoplankton, the
foundation of the aquatic food chain, doesn't grow.
P enters Arrow Lake
from a variety of sources: dissolved organic matter carried in streams,
the atmosphere, residential waste, fertilizer applied with the rye
seed for dust control in Revelstoke Reach, and, historically (but
not since the Grand Coulee Dam was constructed), from the decomposition
of anadromous salmon. The total dissolved P in the Arrow Lake reservoir
is 197,000 kg P. The P load increases from north to south, enabling
higher primary productivity in the Lower Arrow. Although local streams
do carry P from dissolved organic matter into the Arrow Lake reservoir,
it is found in very low concentration in the water column as it
may settle with the cooler stream water.
Although Arrow Lake
receives a higher natural total P load than Kootenay Lake, the productivity
of the Arrow system is lower than that of Kootenay, possibly due
to lower bioavailability, as is being examined.
Nitrogen is another
key nutrient for primary production. 90% of nitrogen is in nitrate
form; 10% is nitrite. The N:P ratio is 36:1 in the Arrow system,
further confirming the P limitation theory. The nitrate concentration
decreases from north to south along the reservoir, resulting in
a lower N:P ratio in the Lower Arrow, closer to the ratios which
are useable by the phytoplankton primary producers. The total dissolved
nitrogen in the whole lake is 7,200,000 kg N.
Biodiversity
in a lake is a good indicator of nutrient levels. Phytoplankton
and zooplankton are tiny plants and animals suspended in the
water column where they form the basis for the entire aquatic
food chain (see Biodiversity of Aquatic Ecosystems). Phytoplankton
and zooplankton population diversity and abundance were assessed
in Arrow and Kootenay Lakes. Researchers found phytoplankton
abundance and population composition is typical of oligotrophic
systems. Zooplankton abundance indicates that Arrow Lakes
is less productive than Kootenay Lake which is beginning to
show some results from fertilization (see Research
and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems. The
mysid shrimp numbers found in Arrow Lakes also indicates it
to be less productive than Kootenay Lake, and lower Arrow
is more productive than upper Arrow. Although the mysid shrimp
competition did not cause the collapse of the Arrow Lake ecosystem,
it was likely a direct contributor to the decline of the kokanee
populations. Kokanee abundance is further evidence that Arrow
Lake is less productive than Kootenay Lake and Upper Arrow
is less productive than Lower Arrow. Kokanee spawner size
and fecundity are depressed compared to historical data available.
Aquatic Ecosystem Topics